|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Department on the Status of Women
Create a Workplace Free of Sexual Harassment
Employee & Employer Handbook on Sexual Harassment San Francisco Commission on the Status of Women Revised Edition 1993 Table of Contents What is Sexual Harassment? Sexual Harassment
1. Use of the feminine pronoun in this pamphlet shall also include the masculine; the authors acknowledge that harassers and those harassed are male as well as female. Definition Of Sexual Harassment On September 23, 1980, the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission adopted the final guidelines on sexual harassment. Harassment on the basis of sex is a violation of Sec. 703 of Title Vll of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (_ 1604.11). Title Vll states,"Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when: (1) submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment; (2) submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or (3) such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment..." "...An employer, employment agency, joint apprenticeship committee or labor organization (hereinafter collectively referred to as "employer") is responsible for its acts and those of its agents and supervisory employees with respect to sexual harassment regardless of whether the specific acts complained of were authorized or even forbidden by the employer and regardless of whether the employer knew or should have known of their occurrence..." "...With respect to conduct between fellow employees, an employer is responsible for acts of sexual harassment in the workplace where the employer knows or should have known of the conduct, unless it can show that it took immediate and appropriate corrective action..." "...An employer may also be responsible for the acts of nonemployees, with respect to sexual harassment of employees in the workplace, where the employer knows or should have known of the conduct and fails to take immediate and appropriate corrective action..." There are two forms of sexual harassment recognized by the courts: quid pro quo and hostile environment. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when submission to sexual conduct is made a condition of employment benefits. Hostile work environment sexual harassment occurs when the sexually harassing conduct is so severe or pervasive as to create a hostile, intimidating, offensive work environment. Are You Being Sexually Harassed In The Workplace?
Steps To Take Against Sexual Harassment
2. Sexual harassment complainants have lost in court because their employer was not given the opportunity to remedy the situation. Such prior notification is not, however, always required. How To Handle A ComplaintAt the first sign of sexual harassment:
Be aware! Some forms of sexual harassment may encompass sexual stereotypes about sexual orientation and/or people of color. Any comprehensive training must incorporate education on this aspect of sexual harassment. Be aware! You may be responsible for the actions of all your supervi sors, employees, clients, customers and vendors who may engage in sexual harassment. Remember: Sexual Harassment Is Illegal! As An Employer, You Are Responsible!A Sample Sexual Harassment Policy(3) Name of Company recognizes and reaffirms its policy of providing equal employment opportunity to all qualified persons, and reaffirms its commitment that there shall be no discrimination against qualified applicants or employees on the basis of race, sex, color, national origin, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, or veteran's status. It is also the policy of Name of Company that sexual harassment is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Any management employee that believes that sexual harassment may be occurring is required to report the conduct to the appropriate human resources officer or other management employee. Sexual harassment includes, but is not limited to: 1. Making unsolicited and unwelcome written, verbal, physical, and/ or visual contact with sexual overtones. (Written examples: suggestive or obscene letters, notes, invitations. Verbal examples: derogatory comments, slurs, jokes, epithets, including conduct or comments consistently directed at only one gender even if the content is not sexual. Physical examples: assault, touching, impeding or blocking movement. Visual examples: leering, gestures, display of sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons, posters and magazines.) 2. Continuing to express sexual interest after being informed that the interest is unwelcome. (Reciprocal attraction is not considered sexual harassment.) 3. Making reprisals, threats of reprisal, or implied threats of reprisal following a negative response. For example, either implying or actually witholding support for an appointment, promotion, or change of assignment, or suggesting that a poor performance report will be given. 4. Engaging in implicit or explicit coercive sexual behavior which is used to control, influence, or affect the career, salary, and/or work environment of another employee. 5. Offering favors or employment benefits, such as promotions, favorable performance evaluations. preferential duty or shift assignments, recommendations, reclassifications, etc., in exchange for sexual favors. 3.Sections of this sample policy were taken from " Sexual Harassment: Managing Ambiguity and Conflict", by Barry M. Shapiro and The Bar Association of San Francisco's " Sexual Harassment Policy Guidelines. This policy applies to all phases of the employment relationship, including recruiting, testing, hiring, upgrading, promotion/demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, rates of pay, benefits and selection for training. Moreover, it is the stated policy of Name of Company to prevent and prohibit misconduct on the job, including sexual harassment or any other type of employee harassment by coworkers, subordinate employees, nonemployees, or supervisors. Any employee found to have acted in violation of the foregoing policies shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, including warnings, reprimands, suspension and/ or discharge. All complaints of sexual harassment shall be directed to a member of the Sexual Harassment Committee and shall be handled confidentially to the maximum extent possible. The Committee has full responsibility to receive, investigate and resolve complaints involving violations of the policies stated herein, and to recommend to management the imposition of appropriate sanctions against violators. The individuals listed below are hereby designated as Name of Company's Sexual Harassment Committee.(4) Member A, Member B, Member C An individual also may choose to report the complaint to his/her su pervisor or any member of management. (Note that a supervisor who has not had special training in dealing with sexual harassment complaints is strongly encouraged to consult a trained member of the Sexual Harassment Committee before taking action.) If the supervisor successfully resolves the complaint in an informal manner to the ccomplaints' satisfaction, the supervisor must file a confidential report to Management or Designated Individual about the complaint and reso lution so that the employer will be aware of any pattern of harassment by a particular individual and of all complaints of sexual harassment or an employerwide basis. If the supervisor does not successfully resolve the complaint in an informal manner, a written report must be made to Personnel Director within .. one work day. In determining whether sexual harassment has occurred, the standard to be applied is that of the victim, so long as this perspective is reasonable for a person of the same gender under similar circumstances. It is no defense to a claim of sexual harassment that the alleged harasser did not intend to harass. 4.The employer should designate a group of individuals comprised of both genders, a variety of age groups, job positions, ethnic backgrounds, and levels of seniority. Retaliation Against Any Person Who Files A Formal Charge Or Complaint Of Harassment Is Prohibited And Is Grounds For Discipline Up To And Including Termination. Name of company will also establish yearly training sessions on handling sexual harassment complaints for all supervisors and managers, and conduct separate training sessions for subordinate employees concerning their rights under Title Vll of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This policy statement shall be distributed to all management and employees and will be posted in areas where all employees will have the opportunity to freely review it. In accordance with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing requirements, a copy of an informational pamphlet and " Discrimination/ Harassment Poster" will he posted at all work sites. Sexual Harassment CasesFederal Cases Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,477 U.S. 67,106 S. Ct.2399 (1986). The United States Supreme Court states that sexual harassment is actionable under Title Vll and that an employer may be liable for sexual harassment even when the victim suffers no tangible or economic loss. An employer may be liable where sexual harassment is so severe or pervasive that it creates a hostile or abusive work environment. Intlekofer v. Turnage, 973 F.2nd 773 {9th Cir. 1992) The Ninth Circuit held that employers are required under Title Vll to take steps, including disciplinary action against a harasser, to ensure a prompt and effective end to workplace sexual harassment. If the action taken by the employer to correct the harassing behavior is untimely and/or ineffec tive, the employer may be held liable. Ellison v. Brady,. 924 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991). In this case, a female employee received strange love letters from a male coworker who repeatedly asked her to go to lunch or for a drink. The Ninth Circuit held that the severity and pervasiveness of sexual harassment should be evaluated from the point of view of a "reasonable woman." Where a "reasonable woman" would consider the conduct sufficiently severe to create an abusive working environment, a violation of Title Vll has occurred. Priest v. Rotary, 98 F.R.D. 755 (1983). The court held that an employer accused of sexual harassment was barred from inquiring into the complainant's sexual history, including the name of each person with whom she had sexual relations in the past ten years. Miller v. Bank of America, 600 F.2d 211 (9th Cir. 1979). In this case, a male supervisory employee fired a female subordinate employee after she refused his demand for sexual favors. The Ninth Circuit held that the employer could be liable for such actions by the supervisor even though the employer had a Policy against such behavior. . California Cases Vinson v. Superior Court,43 Cal.3d 833,740 P.2d 404,239 Cal.Rptr. 292 (1987). The court stated that a mental examination of the complainant is not justified where the complainant is not seeking mental or emotional damages but simply compensation for enduring an oppressive work environment. In any case, the employer may not inquire into the comnlainant's past sexual history and practices. Fisher v. San Pedro Hospital, 214 Cal.App.3d 590, 262 Cal. Rptr. 842 {1 1989. Similar to federal case law,California prohibits sexual harassment resulting from an offensive or hostile work environment, even if the complainant suffers no tangible job detriment. Rojo v. Kliger. 52 Cal.3d 65 (1990). The California Supreme Court recognizes that sexual harassment, whether public or private, raises a claim under the public policy of the State of California. Complainants need not resort to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. Laws and Regulations
Bibliography AndersonDavis & Associates, "Sexual Harassment: Facts vs. Myths," 1986. Backhouse, Constance, and Cohen, Leah, "Sexual Harassment on the Job: How to Avoid the Working Woman's Nightmare," PrenticeHall, Inc., N.J., 1980. The Bar Association of San Francisco, "Sexual Harassment Policy Guidelines," 1992. Brinkman & Associates, "Changing Boundaries: Recognizing, Preventing and Resolving Sexual Harassment," 1300 12th Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122, 1993. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, "Case Analysis Manual," Volumes 1 and 2, November, 1982. Coalition of Labor Union Women, "9 to 5 Guide for Combating Sexual Harassment." Colagost, Camille, "Stopping Sexual Harassment." Labor Notes. EEOC Policy Guidance, N915.035, October 25, 1988. Gordon, Linda, "The Politics of Sexual Harassment," Radical America, Volume 15, No. 4, pp. 714, JulyAugust 1981. MacKinnon, Catherine A., "Sexual Harassment of Working Women," Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1979. Petrocelli, William and Repa, Barbara Kate, "Sexual Harassment on the Job," Nolo Press, 1992. Renick, James C., "Sexual Harassment at Work: Why it Happens, What to Do About It," Personnel Journal, Volume 59, No. 8, August 1980. Roberts, Jane and Chapman, Gordon R., "Sexual Harassment of Women in Employment Art. lll: Promising Solutions," Fall, 1984. Schiller, Carol, "Processing A Complaint," presentation at the Fair Employment and Housing Act Conference, San Francisco, May 27, 1983. Shapiro, Barry M. & Associates, "Sexual Harassment: Managing Ambiguity and Conflict," 447 Hoffman Ave., San Francisco, CA 94114, 1984. Simmons, Richard J., "Employment Discrimination and EEO Practice Manual for California Employers," 3rd Edition, Castle Publications Ltd., Siniscalco, Gary R., et. al., "The New Title Vll," Employment Law Update. Vol. 921, Winter, 1992. Sexual Harassment ResourcesGovernment Resources San Francisco Human Rights Commission (City) Department of Fair Employment and Housing (State) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Federal) U.S. Dept. of Education Advocacy Organizations Bar Association of San Francisco Chinese for Affirmative Action Coalition for Immigrant Refugee Rights Coalition for Labor Women Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund In 1993, this brochure was revised and updated with the invaluable assistance of Bethany Berger, Larry Brinkin, Trisha Brinkman, Nancy Davis, Rose Fua, Tracey Grossbach, Lisa Guggenhime, Isabel Huie, Sharon Johnson, Pauline Kim, Judith Klain, Mary Lyall, Leatrice Miyashiro, Sheila Mullen Rosario Navarrette, Veronica Ng, Jackie Ortega, Millie Phillips Margaret Roeckl, Patricia Shiu, Michelle Still and Aleeta Van Runkle. Special thanks goes to Pacific Bell, who paid for all printing costs to reproduce this handbook and to Bank of America for their generous contribution. |
|
||||
|
|||||